Initiative file / Judicial
Anonymization with Nymiz
Evidence record v2
03 / 31
- Institution
- Judicial Branch
- Editorial classification
- Verified adoption
- Initiative type
- AI component
- Documented phase
- Operational
- Relationship to AI in the source
- Explicit relationship to AI
- Execution evidence
- Confirmed
- First evidence
- Last verified
- Next review: Nov 19, 2026
Documented scope
What it is
Artificial-intelligence tool implemented by the Judicial Branch to depersonalize rulings and protect sensitive data. The institution identifies Nymiz as the platform used and documents its application in the process.
Objective stated by the institution
Depersonalize judicial rulings to protect sensitive data before consultation or publication.
Known timeline
Only milestones with an explicit date in the sources or editorial review are shown.
- Operational start
- First evidence
- Latest editorial verification
- Next scheduled review
Evidence reading
Each dimension is assessed separately. Undetermined marks an evidence gap; not applicable means the dimension does not correspond to the documented object.
What is confirmed
- The Judicial Branch confirms the implementation and use of Nymiz in ruling-depersonalization processes.
What could not be determined
- No public institutional metrics on time savings or processing volume were found.
Documented results
Results are published only when a source traceably attributes them to this initiative.
No public results attributable to this initiative were found in the current review.
Evidence matrix
Sources and traceability
Sources state which claims they support, their origin and the date on which they were consulted.
- [1]New artificial-intelligence tool is applied to improve data protection
- Publisher
- Poder Judicial de Costa Rica
- Source type
- Official primary source
- Published
- Consulted
Supports: existence · stated objective · execution · AI technique · governance
- [2]Forum on the benefits and challenges of artificial intelligence in judicial work
- Publisher
- Poder Judicial de Costa Rica
- Source type
- Official primary source
- Published
- Consulted
Supports: existence · execution · AI technique · operational use
Open questions
- What volume of rulings does Nymiz process, and what error or human-correction rates does the Judicial Branch record?
Context
The case has institutional evidence for implementation, technique and its data-protection purpose. No Judicial Branch public metrics were found to support the time reduction previously published.
Related projects
Verified adoptionPilot
Verified:
Document classification for debt collection
Judicial Branch pilot plan to automatically classify documents received by the Specialized Debt Collection Court of Pérez Zeledón. The official source confirms the use of artificial intelligence and reports faster case processing.
- Initiative type
- AI system
- Pilot start
Verified adoptionOperational
Verified:
ML model for budget execution forecasting
Machine-learning model used by the Judicial Branch to predict budget execution from its historical behavior. The institution’s 2019 accountability report documents its use and associated savings.
- Initiative type
- AI system
- Operational start
Ecosystem and capabilitiesOperational
Verified:
AI analysis of Constitutional Chamber rulings
Research project by UCR’s Legal Research Institute and the State of the Nation Program. Since 2020 it has developed a standardized database, thematic classification and automated analysis of Constitutional Chamber rulings for academic research.
- Initiative type
- Research
- First evidence