Initiative file / Judicial

Continuous Disbursement System

Evidence record v2

05 / 31

Institution
Judicial Branch
Editorial classification
Ecosystem and capabilities
Initiative type
Digitization without confirmed AI
Documented phase
Operational
Relationship to AI in the source
Relationship to AI undetermined
Execution evidence
Confirmed
First evidence
Last verified

Documented scope

What it is

Judicial Branch system that automates lower-value judicial deposit disbursements. The institutional source confirms its operation and results but does not identify an artificial-intelligence technique.

Objective stated by the institution

Automate lower-value judicial deposit disbursements.

Known timeline

Only milestones with an explicit date in the sources or editorial review are shown.

  1. First evidence
  2. Operational start
  3. Latest editorial verification

Evidence reading

Each dimension is assessed separately. Undetermined marks an evidence gap; not applicable means the dimension does not correspond to the documented object.

What is confirmed

Confirmed evidence is detailed in the matrix and documented results; there are no additional notes in this field.

What could not be determined

  • The official source describes automation but does not identify an artificial-intelligence technique.

Documented results

Results are published only when a source traceably attributes them to this initiative.

  1. The Judicial Branch reported 223,154 disbursements totaling ₡5.245 billion during 2024.

    [1]

Evidence matrix

Existence

Confirmed

Execution

Confirmed

AI technique

Not applicable

Operational AI use

Not applicable

Results

Confirmed

Governance

Not applicable

Sources and traceability

Sources state which claims they support, their origin and the date on which they were consulted.

  1. [1]
    Continuous Disbursement System automates judicial deposits
    Publisher
    Poder Judicial de Costa Rica
    Source type
    Official primary source
    Published
    Consulted

    Supports: existence · execution · reported result

Open questions

No additional open questions were recorded in the current review.

Documented relationships

Context

It remains in the catalog because of its relevance to judicial automation, but it is classified as digitalization without demonstrated AI. No evidence was found to present it as a layer of the document classifier.

Related projects